The puppet master of the Democratic Party, Barack Obama, wasn’t satisfied with undermining human autonomy and personal privacy with socialist healthcare. He is now going after free speech, although he calls it “disinformation.” In his speech to Stanford University sponge-brains last Thursday titled “Disinformation is a Threat to Our Democracy,” Obama attacked the First Amendment, saying that wild conspiracy theories like claims that COVID vaccines and treatments were ineffective and that the 2020 election was fraught with voter integrity issues should be regulated. In all, Obama said that what amounted to dissent against the government and Democratic Party narratives threatens democracy.
His solution is very similar to how he fixed the healthcare system—set up a government regulatory entity that determines what is disinformation and misinformation and then censors it or regulates it. Let’s remember how this worked in healthcare. The Centers for Disease Control controlled treatment protocols for COVID by paying hospitals bonuses (bounties) of about $100,000 per patient for CDC mandated treatments such as Remdesivir and ventilators. Virtually no other treatments were allowed despite multiple studies that indicated CDC treatments carried with them 50-80% mortality rates. CDC characterized legitimate scientific and experiential studies questioning CDC mandates as misinformation. Untold thousands died after these treatments, and the impact of vaccines not performing as indicated is mounting.
Dissent questioning the effectiveness of the vaccines and the mandated treatments was censored and people made decisions to take an experimental vaccine without full disclosure of its tremendously unhealthy side effects. Anyone attempting to blow the whistle on this was ostracized. Many lost their jobs, were threatened with losing their licenses to practice medicine. It is a system that betrays scientific autonomy. Obama wants to set up a government regulating body made up of nonelected technology companies, advocacy groups and government officials to “regulate” speech. He considers this cross section as most qualified to determine what kind of speech to allow across social media platforms.
This commission would not be concerned with, as Obama puts it, absolute truth or fixed truth, but rather what is “more true.” And he proposes to regulate—translated censor–speech that attacks his brand of politics because nothing else is “more true.” If the commission considers it “more true” that there was no voter integrity or security issues in an election, all opinions otherwise would be censored. Ephesians 5:6 says, “Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things comes the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.” The ability to dissent comes from the guaranteed right of free speech. Taking away such right by deceitfully characterizing it as saving democracy by eradicating disinformation is a step toward tyranny. It is, say it with me…Stupidocrisy.
