A perilous information suppression campaign

There is no greater censorship or information suppression than what is being conducted on a daily basis in the overall COVID debate. This debate extends into almost all walks of society and is found regarding statistics, treatments, mandates, and science. But it’s not much of a debate if it is only one-sided. For example, doctors in Canada cited stillbirth statistics among vaccinated women. The hospital attacked the doctors for misinformation, but cited no statistics to support its claim. Likewise, CDC said there was an increase in COVID deaths among pregnant women during the Delta variant spike in August and September, but did not cite how many were vaccinated. Is this withholding pertinent information?

This is a concentrated suppression campaign conducted by government bureaucracies, news media, academia, scientific publishing, and powerful Big Tech companies, according to Doctors Harvey Risch, Robert W. Malone, and Byram Bridle in an editorial for The Federalist. Risch is professor of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, and Yale Cancer Center. He published the seminal paper on early treatment of high-risk COVID-19 outpatients in the American Journal of Epidemiology. Malone is a pioneer of mRNA technology. Bridle is an associate professor of viral immunology at the University of Guelph in Canada, whose research team studies the body’s immune response to viruses and develops vaccines to prevent infectious diseases.

They wrote: “the censorship aims to stamp out any questions about a universal vaccination program that, it is now clear, was based on the false premise that low-risk individuals must get vaccinated to halt the spread of COVID-19 and end the pandemic…Any discussion of vaccine-related injuries and mortality is immediately labeled disinformation because it necessarily relies on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)…Since the COVID-19 vaccination program began last December, VAERS has recorded a total of more than 946,000 post-vaccination adverse events and almost 20,000 post-vaccination deaths. The largest daily death counts occurred within two days of vaccination, gradually subsiding with the length of time since the shot.” They say this signals at least a causal connection behind these events.

The Doctors wrote: “The trend is corroborated by data from abroad: over the same period, the United Kingdom’s Yellow Card system, equivalent to VAERS, has recorded 400,000 individual reports of adverse events following COVID vaccination, including more than 1,800 deaths.” The doctors also cited “fatally flawed” safety reviews hallmarked by poor practices, data integrity issues, and conflicts of interest. They concluded that questioning the competence and integrity of the FDA doesn’t make someone a spreader of disinformation, “Dissent is an integral part of the sacred compact between government and governed that underpins a free society, and Americans allow the current regime of censorship to continue at their extreme peril.” 2 Timothy 3:1 says, that “in the last days perilous times will come.” These censorships are perilous to all because they will be used to oppress and persecute in the name of health.

To read the entire editorial:


Posted in

Bill Wilson